On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:31:01AM +0100, Crispin Flowerday wrote: > > > - I'm releasing cvs snapshots weekly (ish). Every one fixes bugs and > > > brings improvements and new features. When do we stop doing this and > > > say this version will go into sarge? We cannot release with a cvs > > > snapshot from a few weeks before sarge is relased > > The problem with release CVS snapshots is that that is what they are, > you can't expect a snapshot to be as stable as a proper release. For > instance the latest snapshot 20030813 has quite a major bug that causes > lockups and crashes.
Notice that aj said in : http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200308/msg03292.html |> I intended to include both wl and wl-beta in Debian unstable/ |> testing/stable. | |Why? If wl-beta is Debian release-quality, why would anyone want to |use wl? Are you doing this for the benefit of users, or because you're |worried you might be guessing wrong, or because it's what upstream |prefers, or what? So, i don't think he would agree to be the reason for removing galeon from unstable because it is a cvs snapshot. Friendly, Sven Luther
