El mar, 02-09-2003 a las 15:29, Christian Marillat escribi�: > Carlos Perell� Mar�n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > El mar, 02-09-2003 a las 14:31, Ramiro Alba Queipo escribi�: > >> Hello everybody: > >> > >> I am using the GNOME 2.2 Debian backport from the begining and y it goes > >> fine (well, except sound: esd blocks the main task bar from time to time > >> and I must kill it; gnome recorder also crash) and I would like to know > >> if the epiphany browser > >> (I recently installed it) is ready for production. > >> Until now it goes fine, but the question is: > >> If there is no problem, why is under mozilla-1.3 directory and not under > >> the main with the rest of the packages? > >> It is important to now this for me I am about to installi Woody with > >> GNOME 2.2 in our Laboratory. > > > > Epiphany will be a 1.0 release next week with the GNOME 2.4 release, and > > it works really nice here, so yes, it's ready for production. > > Not really. Epiphany need functionality from GNOME 2.4 See bug #200798
I don't think that it's an important bug, it's only a cosmetic one and it works without it (of course you lose that feature) Cheers. > > Christian -- Carlos Perell� Mar�n Debian GNU/Linux Sid (PowerPC) Linux Registered User #121232 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] || mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://carlos.pemas.net Valencia - Spain
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
