<quote who="Matthew Garrett"> > We shouldn't be pushing 2.4 into unstable until we're sure that it's > approximately as stable as 2.2 is.
I don't think that's true. We shouldn't be pushing 2.4 into unstable until we've ensured that testing has a stable and complete desktop. Then, 2.4 *should* go into unstable, without a lot of testing, because it's marked as stable software, we'd love to see it in sarge, and it will only get testing if it's in unstable. - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia http://lca2004.linux.org.au/ "Can we have a special TELSABUG category, and everything gets dropped to fix them first?" - Telsa Gwynne
