On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 01:37:40AM -0700, Mike Markley wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 04:35:37PM +0100, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I probably should've cc'ed -gtk-gnome. The theory is that a working > > control-center in testing and no gnome-pilot for now is better than a > > broken control-center and a probably-working gnome-pilot. I don't know > > yet if AJ will agree. > > > > It would be a good idea to freeze control-center and its dependencies > > for a few days in unstable so that all this can work. > > > > (Note: this does *not* mean removing gnome-pilot from unstable, nor that > > it has no chance of getting into sarge. Don't panic.) > > [puts on gnome-pilot maintainer's hat] > > Do whatcha gotta do. gnome-pilot is waiting for a few things (and one RC > bug that's probably not gnome-pilot bug, but the submitter's email address > bounces so I'm waiting for someone else who reported seeing it happen to > check something for me).
It's done now: control-center | 1:2.2.2-1 | testing | source The only missing dependencies of gnome-core in testing are now nautilus and nautilus-media. The former is waiting on gcc-3.3 to be fixed (which should happen soon) and on whatever's stopping libgsf from building on m68k; the latter needs gstreamer and gst-plugins to be fixed. If the KDE maintainers get their ducks in a row, and with a bit of luck, we should be able to get gnome-pilot back. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
