On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:47:28AM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: > "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > 1. Using the gconf method isn't good enough because some users > > > > won't see the changes (because they have made changes > > > > themselves) > > > > > > No, wrong. I've never said that. > > > > You _are_ pulling my leg, right? > > > > Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:08:06 +0100 > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > First setting a gconf key will be only useful for new user. If you > > change a gconf key in the postinst this will change nothing in users > > configurations and users will lost nothing. The good approach is to > > use update-alternative as the current desktop-base do. > > Where are you readind that I wrote the folowing ? > > "(because they have made changes themselves)"
S'ils n'ont rien chang� � leur configuration, le fait de changer le sch�ma changera aussi la cl� gconf qu'ils ont, sauf s'ils l'ont express�ment personnalis�e. Et s'ils l'ont personnalis�e, c'est qu'ils ne veulent pas d'une autre, aussi debianesque soit elle. Enfin, je crois que c'est ce qu'ils veulent dire. -- JCD
