Chris Eisley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 14:19, Ole Laursen wrote: > > One thing good about it is that is much easier to get to the bookmarks > > you use often. For instance, I tag my home page with "personal". Then > > I just have to type > > > > pers + <down> + <down> + <enter> > > > > What do you mean by "tagging"? The behavior you're describing sounds > like url autocompletion as found in Galeon and most other browsers, but > you're probably referring to something else.
Yeah, by tagging I mean adding it to a subject. I'm not sure what terminology the English version uses. But when you add a bookmark, you can attach multiple keywords to it, which will make it show up in multiple places. What I described above is that Epiphany supports completion on keywords. So you enter a keyword (or a part of it) and it shows you the matching bookmarks like with URL completion. > > The search thing in the bookmarks window is quite good too. But I > > agree that the list in the bookmark menu is horrible. > > Yeah, the problem I have with Epiphany is that it makes it unpleasant to > browse to bookmarks soley with the mouse. I have bookmarks organized > into several layers of subfolders so that I don't have to look at a list > of anything more than 5 bookmarks/folders in a menu at a time. Unless a > bookmark has a special icon, it's difficult to read through a menu with > 10+ bookmarks very quickly and find the right one, especially if the > title of the bookmark has a lot of "fluff". If you like using the mouse, you should really use the dedicated bookmarks window. The search thing at the top is very neat. I enter "ole" and it shows me "Ole's home". I enter "pers" and it shows me all bookmarks that are attached to the keyword "personal". Personally, I think the bookmarks menu (as opposed to the window) is a mistake. -- Ole Laursen http://www.cs.auc.dk/~olau/
