Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since when bugs need to be fixed by NMUs ? We have the BTS for that. And > I'm still waiting to see any report fixing a bug from you.
I'm not the NMUer, and I don't know why JHM has done it, but usually he does a pretty good job on a lot of packages. >> be the case here) ... that's not such a big deal ... is it ? > > Yes, when I read the changelog for this NMU : > > | libgnomeprintui (2.4.2-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium > | > | * NMU > | * New upstream release (needed for gnumeric 1.2.2). What's the problem with that ? The upload seems to be because a new version is needed by gnumeric 1.2.2 ... I don't know if JHM has contacted you before (and he should have), but if gnumeric is broken due to libgnomeprintui, and don't see where is the problem to update it ? We all want to have a full working system, who bother if one upload is done by the usual maintainer or by an another ... > I still think that this NMU is a personnal attack, like this e-mail. What's the matter with you ? Why not working with the others maintainers ? Why taking all uploads/mails/... has a personal attack ? You think that maintainers' goal is only to attack you ? One more time: we try to have the best distribution possible, and we doesn't work against the others. What's such the big deal to have an NMU on one of his packages ? Cheers, Sebastien Bacher
