On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 16:02, Emilio Jes�s Gallego Arias wrote: > El jue, 14-10-2004 a las 10:32 -0400, Adam C Powell IV escribi�: > > So then, given that the primary GNOME browsers are mozilla-based, why is > > it that neither of them even suggest mozilla-bonobo? In fact, searching > > through /var/lib/dpkg/available, it is not mentioned as any kind of > > dependency anywhere. > > mozilla-bonobo is believed to have security risks.
Ah, yes. Makes every bonobo component a front-line remotely vulnerable app, as well as the mozilla-bonobo glue code. I tend not to browse "non-trusted" sites, and really like the feature for browsing local files (I have a lot of HTML "index" pages with PDF links). But then, aside from local files, what can be "trusted"? Thanks for the explanation, -Adam P. GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/The_Best_Stuff_In_The_World_Today_Cafe.ogg
