Starting from Beta 2 tarballs, GNOME is in hard code freeze for 2.6 -Rob
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 17:04 -0800, Link Dupont wrote: > On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 13:47, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 05:58, John McCutchan wrote: > > >> I am just wondering what the plan is for gtk 2.4 and gnome 2.6 getting > > >> in to unstable? Since gnome 2.4 is in testing and testing's gnome is > > >> frozen does this mean that gtk 2.4 and gnome 2.6 can go in to unstable > > >> right away? > > > > > > My preferred course of action would be to upload GTK+ 2.4 into unstable > > > pretty quickly as it is an independent library, but build GNOME 2.6 into > > > experimental. > > > > Sorry I was away some days > > > > Just to give my opinion I'd like to start to upload Gnome2.6 & GTK2.4 in > > experimental ASAP (we can start with preleases) and move all that in > > unstable when it'll be ready. > > True, no reason why the beta releases and the RC's couldn't start > getting packaged. They shouldn't change drastically from the final > releases should they? > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Sebastien Bacher > -- > Link Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
