> On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 01:14:40AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > No. For sarge+1. Debian point releases are different. > > Well, I think you should consider changing that policy, called it "Sarge > Second Edition" or something, unless you want to doom sarge from the > start as "stable but old as dirt" like woody is. > > Unless you're hung up on dogma, there is no reason not to release a .1 > release in six months with a gnome refresh, *if* it has otherwise met > the definition of "stable" in that time. (If not, then don't).
One word: Libranet. It releases much more quickly than Debian, is fully compatible with Debian packages, and is a mix of testing/unstable, so that you'll get the latest and greatest.
