On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 07:47, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le ven, 21/05/2004 � 13:29 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a �crit :
> > Of course it's totally optional, but you could also try whether some of > > the common gnome backports upgrade well, maybe there are only > > easy-to-solve issues. > > We can't support all non-official packages use ... > BTW I don't have time to do this, but if somebody want to test this it > would be nice! > I will test my gnome2.2 backport to whatever is in sarge when sarge approaches release. I have taken the stance that this is my responsibility and will adjust my packages accordingly. I won't change the packages to continually follow unstable though, since the gnome2.2 backport is supposed to be as stable as possible and not change all the time. :) Jamie Strandboge -- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG/PGP ID: 26384A3A Fingerprint: D9FF DF4A 2D46 A353 A289 E8F5 AA75 DCBE 2638 4A3A
