Adam C Powell IV escribi�:
On Mon, 2004-05-31 at 08:33, Michael Vogt wrote:I agree, this is open / free software with common files... , so a standard Debian structure for this would be created.
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 09:21:19PM +0200, Ole Laursen wrote:
Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:No. This is a feature is planed as a long-term goal. But we don't have
The upcoming version 0.50 has some nice new features. The GUI isI have been wishing to use a graphical client for ages, but have grown
reworked and simpler, nicer and more HIG compliant. And a lot of code
in the internal engine was cleaned up. See a screenshot here:
http://people.debian.org/~mvo/synaptic/0.50/synaptic-0.50pre1.png
used to the automatic dependency management in Aptitude - so that if a
package is installed automatically to fulfill a dependency, it is also
removed automatically when it is not needed anymore. Do you support
that?
it yet.
<off-topic> Speaking of which, this is something which should really be standardized between the various packaging front-ends. It's very annoying to have built up a list of wanted packages in debfoster, then have them all ignored by aptitude, and build up a new list there to have it ignored by synaptic...
As a user, I'd much appreciate having a standard place where such things are stored across these different apt frontends. Thanks. </off-topic>
-Adam P.
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/The_Best_Stuff_In_The_World_Today_Cafe.ogg
On the other hand, I suggest include Kernel command to control easily the Kernel upgrading (and specially include the "undo kernel-upgrade" command.
Regards.
