On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:57:52PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > >> christophe barbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> What about providing reasons to keep it in the archive instead of asking > >>> (stupid) questions. > >> A package is no problem as long it has no release-critical bugs, so > >> there is no reason to remove it. > > Ok, but we need a bit of direction for not having the unsuspecting user > > install it thinking it is of good quality and well supported, when in > > fact it is not. > > Software can be in a good shape *and* not be supported at the time (at > least very small applications like this). As long as it's useful for > some people, there's no reason to remove it or add "THIS IS NOT > MAINTAINED; GO AWAY AND USE SOMETHING ELSE" notices.
Yep but Christophe spoke about missing features and bugs, so ... Friendly, Sven Luther
