On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Michael Banck wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 10:54:56PM +0300, Martin-�ric Racine wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > > > Because it is an inappropriate issue to solve at the distribution > > > level, and will not be usefully solved within Debian without > > > upstream participation. If you want to solve some classes of > > > problems, you need to deal with upstream. > > > > Given how Pennington wrecked havoc with our desktop, there's no point > > in bringing up the issue with upstream. Seriously, Epiphany and > > several recent decisions by upstream fall under the fallacious "we > > know what's best for you and blah blah we don't hear what you're > > saying" childish game. > > Ah, you're back?
Geez, What kind of a statement is that? Just because someone doesn't reply to every post doesn't mean they're not following the thread. > You might be interested in packaging a new project > which aims to make GNOME usable again. Check out: > > http://www.akcaagac.com/index_goneme.html *very* interesting project! Thanks for the link. -- Martin-�ric Racine, ICT Consultant http://www.iki.fi/q-funk/
