On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:33:02PM +0000, Robert Hart wrote: > On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 22:04 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > It could probably be arch: all too, and tasksel modified to check for a 2.6 > > kernel, and install it instead of m-g2 in case a 2.6 kernel is detected. > > Doesn't this all need to be done at runtime? Isn't it relatively common
Yes, at post d-i reboot runtime, which will most assuredly run the kernel that was chosen during d-i. > for people to have both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels installed? The package Only for advanced users, and they know how to handle this situation. > manager wont have a clue which one is actually booted, or which one > would be used most often.... Or am I abnormal? `uname -r` will give you the needed output. > Or is this all just to get a sane default install? Yep. Friendly, Sven Luther
