This would also make enlightenment uninstallable. On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:09:54PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > This is an automatically generated report. The gdk-imlib1 package depends > > on libpng2, libpng10-0 or libpng3. It should be rebuilt against the latest > > libpng 1.2 packages, so that libpng 1.0 can safely be removed from the > > archive. > > > Since gdk-imlib1 must be built with libpng2, my proposal is to ask for > the removal of imlib1 and gdk-imlib1. > > Since gdk-imlib1 underlies basically all of GNOME1, that will force > the removal of GNOME1 as was previously mooted: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2005/06/msg00027.html > > Is this okay with the GNOME maintainers? If not, would one or more > of you like to adopt these packages? > > http://bugs.debian.org/289790 > http://bugs.debian.org/289789 > > Thanks, > -Steve Chipzz AKA Jan Van Buggenhout -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Baldric, you wouldn't recognize a subtle plan if it painted itself pur- ple and danced naked on a harpsicord singing 'subtle plans are here a- gain'." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
