Le vendredi 07 octobre 2005 à 11:04 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > Le jeudi 06 octobre 2005 à 22:39 -0600, Dave Loftis a écrit : > > > Does anyone have an idea about timetable for getting gnome 2.12 in the > > > tree? Is there an experimental package? Is there an ETA for an > > > unstable package? I've been looking for info in the lists archive and > > > the #debian channel on freenode. Is there a place I can look for this > > > kind of thing, both now and in the future? > > > > Please read the thread "GNOME 2.10 schedule proposal" and "Update on > > GNOME 2.10 schedule proposal" of those last days. > > In short, work on GNOME 2.12 will start after 2.10 is clean (ie working > > perfectly) in Etch. Discussions are going on about forgetting 2.10 > > alltogether at the moment, but still GNOME 2.10 is still the first step. > > Notice that this doesn't give any real hint about *when* 2.10 is expected to > be clean though. I know, that's the reason for my second paragraph. ;-)
> > As usual in Debian, it will be ready when it will be ready, no promise, > > but if you want it to happen sooner, you still are welcome to help > > (testing, debugging, patching, ...). > > Yeah, i have some doubts about the helpfullness of this philosophy, but hey, > we will see. Do we have the best OS on Earth, yes or no? :-D So, what would you expect further? ;-) I know we could do better, but it all depends on our hands, and I personally like that. > There are 2.12 packages in experimental though, right ? Yes, but I'm not sure they all work perfectly (and together) yet. > Friendly, > > Sven Luther
