Hi, On Fri, Oct 14, 2005, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > I've written a small script which generates a page with useful > information on tracking what we've achieved so far and what needs work, > simply version-wise: > http://merkel.debian.org/~kov/gnome-packages.html
Rocks! > Please, > people, correct and enhance my view of what's missing, because I'm not > following stuff as closely as you are =(. I think you got the important stuff listed, the biggest blocker still is mozilla, but it seems like it's slowly building everywhere. That will help have yelp, mozilla-bonobo, galeon, and epiphany. SJ won't be easy to get in since it's bound to libmusicbrainz and friends. > So we have plenty of time to plan and stabilize our Debian GNOME > release. I believe we should start working on adding GNOME2.13 to > experimental as soon as we can get, so we'll be able to track what's > going on upstream more closely and influence the development of our > target release version while it's being done. Well, it's a nice goal to have, but I'd prefer going through the stable GNOME releases and stabilizing them in Debian too prior to following the development releases. I agree with trying to follow 2.13 in experimental once we have stabilized 2.12 in unstable+testing. :) > Where to go from here? Speed up GNOME2.12's work and get it in unstable > ASAP, skip GNOME2.12 completely and start working on 2.13 right now on > experimental? Or the 'start working on GNOME2.13 while it's still under > development' thing does not appeal to the team and we should target > GNOME2.12 on unstable for mid-April? I'd prefer going through 2.12. Ubuntu has 2.12 packages we can look at any time we want. :) Cheers, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
