Le vendredi 14 octobre 2005 à 16:23 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva a écrit :
> The consensus up to now (from my talk in IRC with seb128 and from lool's > email) seems to be "let's focus on having gnome2.12 in unstable and then > move on". Since we have almost 5 months to stabilize 2.12 now that 2.10 > is in testing, before 2.14 comes out. Hi, As said on IRC, moving GNOME 2.12 to unstable will not be a piece of cake because it needs to move with the new dbus/hal so propably with a new KDE too. So for the moment we would have the choice the work on GNOME 2.12 on GNOME 2.13. I think we should pick the first option for somes reasons: - if we start working on GNOME 2.13 before having 2.12 to unstable we let the choice to users between GNOME 2.10 or an unstable GNOME 2.13. People probably expect to have the current GNOME stable rather than an unstable branch. - tracking an unstable branch is a lot of work. Updates and bugs come quite often, you have to deal with patching and to reply to bug. For the moment the GNOME team has no enough people to do a clean job on that imho (the BTS for most of packages is already lagging on replies). - we should better to put some efforts to sort the gconf/icon cache changes now so we are ready when GNOME 2.14 comes. Cheers, Sebastien Bacher -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
