On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:28 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2006, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Err, what's wrong with the solution used by e.g. the packages listed by > > Precisely what I said. :) > > We do this for a small number of important packages, such as important > libraries, but it's not something done for all libraries, and even less > for packages (eg. evolution-dbg, epiphany-browser-dbg, gedit-dbg, ...).
The only arguably significant problem would seem to be with Packages.gz, and I'm not sure a couple more -dbg packages would really matter for that. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
