> If we are going to ship GNOME 2.16 in etch Are we?
-- Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or ... Eddy Petrişor
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or ... Sebastien Bacher
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphic... Sven Luther
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: gra... Sebastien Bacher
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was:... Sven Luther
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (... Sebastien Bacher
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-... Sven Luther
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Sebastien Bacher
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Sven Luther
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Josselin Mouette
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Ondrej Sury
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Eddy Petrişor
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Sebastien Bacher
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Eddy Petrişor
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Attilio Fiandrotti
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Eddy Petrişor
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Attilio Fiandrotti
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Josselin Mouette
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Josselin Mouette
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etc... Sven Luther
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was:... Eddy Petrişor
