On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 04:28 -0700, Alex Malinovich wrote: > Try as I might, I just can't find any reason why this should be like > this. My CPU usage never goes above 1-2% during the copy, so it > shouldn't be CPU-bound.
It's an inherent issue in the design of gnome-vfs. The replacement,
gvfs, is being written now and is already an order of magnitude faster
with SMB despite having no performance tuning yet. :)
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
