On 18/06/13 11:55, Johannes Rohr wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 18.06.2013, 11:08 +0200 schrieb Jordi Mallach: >> El dt 18 de 06 de 2013 a les 08:50 +0200, en/na Johannes Rohr va >> escriure: >>> Now, maybe there is a good reason to include this package into the GNOME >>> desktop metapackage, but if there is one, I'd like to know what it is. What >>> is the rationale behind this decision? How do you define what is part of >>> GNOME and what isn't? >> >> meta-gnome3 (1:3.4+3) unstable; urgency=low >> >> [...] >> >> * Install iceweasel instead of epiphany :( >> See bug#682481. >> * Let gnome recommend iceweasel-l10n-all. >> * Require firefox extensions that match epiphany functionality: >> keyring, adblock. > > > Thanks for filling me in! At the same time, there seem to be no open > security related RC bugs file against epiphany in Debian at this time: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=epiphany-browser;tag=security
The problem is rather with webkit in general and/or webkitgtk+ in particular. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51c041b9.8030...@debian.org
