Hi, I'm noticing Haskell packages with all sorts of names for docs:
ftphs-doc - FTP Client and Server Library for Haskell, documentation haskell-haskelldb-doc - API documentation of haskelldb haskell-haskelldb-hsql-mysql-doc - API documentation of haskelldb-hsql-mysql libghc6-hunit-doc - Haskell unit testing framework for GHC; documentation libghc6-parsec-doc - Haskell monadic parser combinator library for GHC; documentation I think we need to discuss this naming. For of all, I don't like libghc6-*-doc, because many of these packages are useful not just for GHC, but also for Hugs. Secondly, why duplicate "haskell" in haskell-haskelldb-doc? Thirdly, though, does using the source name in ftphs-doc make sense? Just looking for some consensus here. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
