Em Sex, 2009-02-06 às 12:37 +0000, Ian Lynagh escreveu:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 02:35:51PM -0200, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
> >
> > --- dh_haskell_configure~ 2008-05-01 08:39:15.000000000 -0300
> > +++ dh_haskell_configure 2009-02-05 13:18:20.000000000 -0200
> > @@ -122,7 +122,10 @@
> > print " CONFIGURING $package FOR $pkgtype";
> > print "\n ****************************************** \n\n";
> >
> > - doit("./setup", "clean");
> > + # ./setup clean will exit with error if there's no .buildinfo file
> > + if (-e glob "*.buildinfo") {
> > + doit("./setup", "clean");
> > + }
>
> This looks wrong to me: Many packages never generate a buildinfo file,
> and "rm editline.buildinfo; ./Setup clean" exits successfully.
I'm sorry about that, you're right, this is a problem specific to
ghc-paths. I'll send a patch to it, and add it in the haskell-ghc-paths
package.
I'm removing this patch from my work in haskell-devscripts.
Greetings.
--
marcot
http://marcot.iaaeee.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
