Hello Joachim,
Em Sáb, 2009-02-28 às 16:12 +0100, Joachim Breitner escreveu: > Am Freitag, den 27.02.2009, 11:55 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > > Am Donnerstag, den 26.02.2009, 22:40 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e > > Silva: > > > the new version of zlib is available at > > > http://debian.holoscopio.com/libghc6-zlib/ . Joachim, can you please > > > upload it to me? > > it’s already uploaded... but I noticed just now that you changed the > source package name to libghc6-zlib. What is the rationale for that? As there's no package for zlib in another compiler, such as hugs, I thought that libghc6 would be a better prefix than haskell, cause it's more precise. Do you think it's a bad idea? > What’s wrong with the common haskell-<cabal package name>? Nothing wrong with it. > Generally, I think, ftp-masters and bts admins do not like it when > source package names change, unless for very good reasons. I didn't knew that. I'll try to avoid it from now. About zlib, should I change it back? Should I keep gtk2hs as it is, instead of changing it to haskell-gtk2hs or libghc6-gtk2hs? Greetings. -- marcot http://marcot.iaaeee.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
