Magnus, Magnus Therning <[email protected]> writes: > I'd recommend starting over, using hlibrary.mk instead. Here's a > shameless plug for my own blog post: > http://therning.org/magnus/archives/458
For my (non-Haskell library) packages, I have switched from using CDBS to dh(1), a new feature in debhelper (>= 7). In general I have found dh(1) makefiles easier to maintain because they have fewer "magic variables". Have you found time to look into the viability of using dh(1) for Haskell libraries? If so, and you decided against it, would you please outline the reasons? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
