Hello. Em Qui, 2009-06-11 às 13:09 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu: (...) > Am Mittwoch, den 10.06.2009, 15:39 -0700 schrieb David Fox: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > what do you think is the appropriate output? I'd say there's > > no > > dependencies for documentation packages. I usually use: > > > > Recommends: ghc6-doc > > Suggests: libghc6-package-dev (= ${binary:Version}) > > > > Should we create a haskell:Recommends and a haskell:Suggests? (...) > Recommending ghc-doc is probably ok. Also, recommending the -doc of any > dependency could be useful (for the links). Bonus: Only depend on those > that are actually linked to.
The way I thought for doing this is searching with dpkg -S for a package with the files linked. This would have to be done in dh_haskell_depends, since dh_haskell_prep is called before build. One problem of this is that dh_haskell_depends is a shell script, and getting the links of a HTML file would be easier to do in Perl than in shell. Do you know about some program that extract the links of a HTML file, that could be used in dh_haskell_depends? (...) > A versioning is useless for Suggests, I > think. Also, I don’t think that people will need this Suggests at all. I think it's good to have the -dev package as a Suggests or Recommends in the -doc package, since the -doc is, at first, not very useful without the -dev. What do you think about unversioned Suggests in the -dev package? Suggests: libghc6-package-dev Greetings. (...) -- marcot http://marcot.iaaeee.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
