Hello Joachim. Em Sex, 2009-07-03 às 11:19 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu: (...) > Given that we are going to maintain a large number of very similar > packages, a common use case will be making similar adjustments to all > packages at once. This would very much benefit from having one VCS > repository for all packages.
Good point, I haven't thought about that, and I agree that's much better for keeping packages in sync. (...) > Using a similar repository layout than they, we can re-use their > tools. > Especially > http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi This is great. (...) > Information on the DPG’s SVN layout can be found here: > http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/subversion.html#2__repository_anatomy I noticed they keep the upstream sources in the repository. What's the point of that? Isn't keeping just the debian/ directories enough? (...) > (Darcs, of course, has some charm on it’s own for a Debian Haskell > Group. I agree with this. (...) > I guess John, being the author of darcs-buildpackage, can > best guess if it’s a good idea to use Darcs). I agree with this too. Greetings. -- marcot http://marcot.iaaeee.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
