Hallo Joachim. Em Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:59:29 +0200 Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> escreveu: (...) > Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 17:48 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e > Silva: > > Em Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:30:04 +0200 > > Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> escreveu: > > (...) > > > haskell-devscripts, by default, build docs with hscolour. At the moment, > > > every package needs a Build-Dependency on hscolour, despite actually > > > mentioning it anywhere. Woudn’t it make more sense to have > > > haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour? > > > > Isn't it the same with gch6, ghc6-prof, ghc6-doc and haddock? Should all of > > them be a dependency? > > Hmm. Actually, yes :-) (...) > This is actually a neat idea to avoid the sourceful uploads that I > mentioned in my last mail: If the upcoming haskell-devscripts that will > move haddock files to -dev would depend on these five packages, it is no > problem if some haskell-* packages still list them as B-D-I, as they > have haddock as a B-D.
On the other hand, ghc6-doc, haddock and hscolour will be a B-D. This is not a problem if .haddock file gets to -dev, but it is if it don't. Auf Wiedersehen. -- marcot http://marcot.iaaeee.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
