Joachim Breitner wrote: > You should not put two UNRELEASED changelog entries on top of each > other, I’d say. If you based your changes on the version in the archive, > then you should remove the other UNRELEASED entry, if not, you should > mention all changes in “your” entry. Which one does apply here?
Mine is mostly derived from the 1.17-6 version so I just dumped the older UNRELEASED section. > I always thought that debhelper dependency and debian/compat number > should match. Is there a reason not to use compat 7? What’s the reason > for the (>= 7.2.3) dependency? Fixed with compat 7 and debhelper (>=7). > No build-dependency on haskell-devscripts. Did you try it in a > cowbuilder? Fixed. Whats in darcs now builds under pbuilder. > I’ve stopped using Build-Depends-Indep. Moved those to Build-Depends. > The Depends, Suggests, and Recommends are now mostly handled by > haskell-devscripts. Check > http://darcs.debian.org/pkg-haskell/haskell-zip-archive/control to see > which ones are available for which package. I followed your example there, but I get: dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${haskell:Depends} dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${haskell:Suggests} Do i need a specific version of haskell-devscripts? > debian/haxml-doc.docs lists LICENCE files. These should not be > installed, as they are in /usr/share/common-licenses and referenced from > debian/copyright. Fixed. Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
