On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:34:12AM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Jeremy Shaw wrote: > > > If that is true, then I would be happy with leaving the current HaXml > > upload alone and creating libghc6-haxml13-dev and having packages > > depend on that if they want the old API. > > I also prefer this option but that would require all apps that currently > have Build-Depends on libghc6-haxml-dev to chaneg that to the haxml13 > version.
I suppose this would be acceptable if someone would be willing to provide patches and (if necessary) do NMUs. I personally find fear of the epoch quite hilarious. It's a tool for a specific job (fix a version numbering mistake). Don't use it when it's not appropriate, use it when it is. But see above. -- Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
