Hi Joachim. Em Qua, 2009-09-23 às 17:17 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu: > Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2009, 16:14 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:04:12PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > >you have a runaway darcs process on alioth: > > >226351 24670 90.7 0.0 99700 7996 ? Rsl Sep22 1279:08 darcs > > >apply --all --repodir /darcs/pkg-haskell/haskell-cabal-install > > > > > >please run "killall -KILL darcs" on alioth. > > > > Thanks, I've done this. This seems to happen about 75% of the time I > > push. I usually notice and kill the process but I guess it slipped by > > this time. Do we have any idea what causes it? Perhaps we can do a > > stable update of darcs to get it fixed. > > Yes, it’s a know bug caused by ghc-6.8. So it’s actually not the darcs > version that matters, but the compiler version it is compiled with. The > “proper” solution is to get ghc-6.10 into backports.org, which I think > Marco attempted. I’m not sure what the state is, maybe he wanted to wait > for 6.12 to be released as it will be easer to bootstrap.
I have searched a little bit about this issue, as is described in: http://lists.debian.org/debian-haskell/2009/08/msg00022.html and I guess the better solution is to upload a patched GHC 6.8.2 to lenny. I asked about how to do this in: http://lists.debian.org/debian-haskell/2009/08/msg00102.html but as no one replied and I wasn't sure about the direction to go, I stoped thinking about it for a time. As it's said on these e-mails, I have the package here ready for going to lenny, needing only some adjustments in debian/changelog. Do you think we should do this upload to stable? Greetings. (...) -- marcot http://marcot.iaaeee.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
