Hello Joachim. Em Dom, 2009-10-18 às 21:31 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu: (...) > Am Sonntag, den 18.10.2009, 17:07 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e > Silva: > > Em Dom, 2009-08-16 às 17:52 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu: > > (...) > > > there are some variations on the -doc package name in Debian, and > > > changing it is probably not viable at the moment (going through NEW and > > > all). > > > > Is this still your opinion? I think it'd be better to have a standard > > format of package names than to change haskell-devscripts, even if doing > > this would take some time. > > It’s still my opinion, but I’m not passionate about it: If someone else > thinks its worth going for, and will do the work (including possible > discussions with ftp-master or so), I’ll happily do the uploading.
I think the work with the packages is small. If we choose to change to libghc6-*-doc, we'll need to change only 30 in my count[0]. This can be easily done. About the ftp-master, maybe the argument of the new haskell policy we're trying to create can convince them. > BTW, which name is better? libghc6-*-doc or haskell-doc? Boths have its > merits? As there 104 packages in libghc6-*-doc format in my count[1], I think we should stick with it. 0: $ apt-cache pkgnames haskell- | grep doc | wc -l 30 1: $ apt-cache pkgnames libghc6- | grep doc | wc -l 104 Greetings. (...) -- marcot http://marcot.iaaeee.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
