Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> writes: > [darcs 2.4 wants hashed-storage 0.3.x > hashed-storage 0.3.x wants mmap 0.4.x > debian has mmap 0.5.x (too new)] > > We have some options now: > > a) Upload mmap-0.4.1 again, using an epoch bump. > b) Introduce an haskell-mmap4 source package and libghc6-mmap4-* binary > packages until hashed-storage uses 0.5.4 > c) Backport the mmap-0.5-compatibility patch from the hashed-storage > 0.4 series and apply that locally. > > Personally, I prefer c) over b) over a). Trent, you are the darcs > maintainer, I guess it’s up to you.
I'd like to defer this decision to Petr Rockai, since he'll have the best understanding of how Darcs and hashed-storage interact and thus whether (c) is the Right Thing or the Wrong Thing. My preference is for (c) if it's the Right Thing. PS: please try to CC anything that needs my immediate attention to me ([email protected]) -- I read direct email in a tighter loop than mailing lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
