Hallo Joachim. Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Qui Mar 25 14:27:16 -0300 2010: (...) > Am Dienstag, den 23.03.2010, 13:46 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e > Silva: > > I noticed that hstringtemplate includes a doc-base file for the HTML haddock > > documentation. Should we do this in all packages and include it in the > > PackageTemplate? > > I’m not sure. I, as a user, never used doc-base.
Me neither. > Also, the haddock libraries are linked in a probably more useful way from > file:///usr/share/doc/ghc6-doc/html/libraries/index.html > Maybe only that should have a doc-base entry, and single modules should > not? > > IIRC some few libraries have real, non-API documentation. These can of > course have a doc-base entry of their own. This is a good point. Does anyone think it's useful also for libraries to provide doc-base links? I'm CCing the doc-base maintainer. Robert, what do you think about this situation? > But if we chose to add doc-base files to all libraries, we should, if > possible, do it via haskell-devscripts. Seconded. Auf Wiedersehen. (...) -- marcot http://wiki.debian.org/MarcoSilva -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1269550711-sup-8...@zezinho
