On Fri, July 9, 2010 10:54, Iain Lane wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:48:36AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: >>Hi Iain, >> >>Am Donnerstag, den 08.07.2010, 12:21 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: >>> GHC is out of date on hurd-i386, and as a result lhs2tex doesn't build >>> there any more. This prevents testing migration; please remove the >>> binary on hurd-i386 (and therefore the old source). >> >>not correct: hurd-i386 is not a release architecture, so problems there >>will not hold up a migration.
That's the idea, yes. However, there have been other issues recently where the BTS was still including a bug in the list of bugs it was generating for britney, despite the fact that the bug was correctly marked as fixed in a version earlier than what was in testing and in all subsequent versions. I discussed that case with Don and his opinion at the time was that the multiple source versions in unstable were causing the issue; the bug wasn't fixed in the hurd binary and removing the o-o-d hurd packages stopped the BTS flagging the bug as relevant for britney, with no further action. >>The reason why lhs2tex was not migrating because a RC bug was fixed in a >>NMU version and that version was omitted in later changelogs, causing >>the bts to think that the bug is still present. I closed this bug >>yesterday (or so), and lhs2tex has migrated by now. Yes, it's migrated. But ftp-master also removed the hurd binaries yesterday before you tried to close the ftp.d.o bug, so that only proves that one of those actions fixed it... Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
