On 07/15/2010 10:49 PM, Kari Pahula wrote: > Replying to debian-release too since they would have a thing or two to > say about this. >
Thanks! A haskell transition isn't something we could describe as "a small update", it would take at least two weeks to have it done. We prefer to not start such a transition at this stage. The freeze is approaching and we are working hard on getting *planned* transitions done in time. You should have raised your voice a bit earlier I'm afraid. > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:08:55PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: >> As I can see it currently, the state of haskell in testing is quite >> well. So if we’d upload ghc6-6.12.3 to unstable now and do _not_ make it >> in testing in time, there is not much of a loss. The only possible >> problem is if we do not make it to testing in time _and_ it turns out >> that we have to fix bugs in testing; then we would have to use >> testing-proposed-updates to fix those. > t-p-u isn't made to finish half broken transitions. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
