Kari Pahula wrote: > So I suppose this is an RFH message.
/me raises hand > I can still stick around as a > comaintainer but it's a bit too much for myself alone. What's the > Haskell team's preferred VCS? I prefer darcs myself but I suppose git > is good too. I prefer darcs over git. > I suppose uploading GHC 7 to unstable is fine already since it won't > replace ghc6 packages due to renaming it to ghc. Just add a ghc6 > pseudopackage after the release. Sounds reasonable. > I haven't yet tried building the new GHC or even had a good look at > it. Is there already repo for the ghc6 packaging? Should we maybe branch it for experimenting with ghc 7? Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
