On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2011, 07:50 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e > Silva: >> Excerpts from Iain Lane's message of Qua Jun 01 07:27:28 -0300 2011: >> (...) >> > Where are we with gitit and haskell-debian? >> >> Well, I have my own version of haskell-debian here, and I can apply the patch >> for supporting the new haxml on David's version. As David has not returned >> any >> of my contact attempts, I believe we can consider him an inactive upstream, >> and >> maybe stick with my version. >> >> The difference between them is mostly that mine is addapted for the current >> DHG >> practices, and gets more information. For instance, it uses apt-file for >> finding out library names. >> >> What's your opinion on this? > > if David has really turned inactive, I’d say it is reasonable to upload > your package to hackage. Hackage does not have Debian’s sense of strong > ownership, it seems. And I think that it is ok for a package called > "debian" to be maintained by a member of the Debian Haskell Group. > > Of course, it would be better if all interested parties can successful > collaborate on one code base, and I think when David comes back, this > will be possible.
Sorry, I'm here. I agree that it would be great for the package to be maintained by DHG. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
