On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:24:16 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 07/06/2011 18:14, Joachim Breitner wrote:
BTW, is it a problem to have the dummy packages from haskell-dummy,
which are arch all, depend on their libghc-*-dev counterpart even
though
it might not exist on all arches? Or is britney satisfied if the
dependencies of an arch:all packages are satisfiable on at least one
architecture?
iirc, they are only checked on i386, but I could be wrong here… Adam?
:)
Yep. arch:all packages _must_ be installable on i386 (which is fun for
e.g. partman-[uz]fs), but britney doesn't care if they're broken
elsewhere.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
