On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Clint Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:34:17PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: >> Another approach would be to find out (e.g. ask upstream) if yesod makes >> sense on a non-threaded runtime. If it turns out that it is hardly >> useful, then it is better to remove yesod on sparce. > > Hi Michael, > > Could you comment? >
Without knowing the background here, I'd say Yesod is almost always going to be using the multi-threaded runtime. The only exception I can think of is some of the backends like CGI and FastCGI, but those are increasingly not used at all. My guess is you'll be safe. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caka2jg+zyrj0aqyb6cpge_uipjfpmejo0av7vb6lhy+enjd...@mail.gmail.com
