On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Joachim Breitner <[email protected]>wrote:
> At the moment, I do not see how dynamically built > Haskell programs are in the interest of our user. > They do offer the prospect of fixing some annoying bugs for free, by offloading them to existing, working system infrastructure. For instance, we can't call C++ code from ghci right now, because ghci's loader doesn't invoke static initializers that C++ libraries tend to use heavily. The "save some bytes" argument seems like a red herring, but it's far from the only thing to pay attention to.
