Colin Watson wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 08:38:05PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > >     -- That definitely is function not implemented
> > >     SYS_344(0x5, 0xf7c7e0f0, 0xf7c7e110, 0x800, 0x10a00000) = -1 ENOSYS 
> > > (Function not implemented)
> > 
> > >From file  /usr/include/powerpc-linux-gnu/asm/unistd.h
> > 
> >     #define __NR_accept4                344
> 
> That appears to have been added in 2.6.37, and praetorius is 2.6.32.  I
> wonder if we're explicitly using accept4 somewhere based on libc
> presence or similar?

Isn't it more likely that its libc deciding to call accept4?

I'm happy to run more tests, but I don't want this machine running 2.6.32
all the time because the fan management isn't working on this kernel. The
fans run full speed all the time. Its rather noisy!

Erik
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to