On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:14:16PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi Joachim, > > when you say FTBFS, you really mean that their build-dependencies are > > not installable, not that the build is attempted and fails (which would > > be bad), right? > > Yes, sorry, it's generally all about build dependencies. Nevertheless I found > the large number of those somewhat alarming.
This is commonplace when something deep in the stack changes to expose a different ABI version string; Joachim typically schedules binNMUs in such cases and these clear out eventually. > As of today I've got a single exception here, which is haskell-process-conduit > (1.1.0.0-1). It says I fixed that earlier today: http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-process-conduit/news/20140616T155059Z.html -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
