Hi,
Am Montag, den 29.12.2014, 22:00 -0600 schrieb Christopher Reichert: > I pushed changes to fix this. Can someone please review the new > copyright and let me know if it's sufficient? I added Comment: Lemmih and David Himmelstrup are the same persons. to avoid repeated confusion about this. > It's not completely clear to me what licensing information is missing > and what license is used in the header of those two source files. I put > BSD-style as seen in the Haddock header but it's very close to the MIT > license. You need to copy all license and copyright information from everywhere in the source file to debian/copyright. So if some files are under a different license as the whole package (as it is the case here), you’ll have to add additional "Files:" stanzas. Also, all copyright must be mentioned. 2005 Jesper Louis Andersen <[email protected]> is missing in debian/copyright. But this package is really in a bad shape (upstream-wise), with only three source files, two of which have a separate license than the whole package. Maybe you should contact upstream to clear things up and put everything under _one_ license and include all copyright holders in .cabal. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
