On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > > Am Donnerstag, den 07.05.2015, 17:14 +0200 schrieb Sven Bartscher: > > > Am 07.05.2015 um 09:39 schrieb Joachim Breitner <[email protected]>: > > > > > > just making sure that we don’t have the situation where everyone thinks > > > the other one is doing it: Is any of you going to fix hsx, or shall we > > > drop it? > > > > Since David said he would do it, I didn’t bother with it anymore, but if > it turns > > out he won’t do it anymore, I will do it in the near future. > > David, are you still planning on doing this, or should I jump in? > > thanks, but he won’t reply if you send this just to me :-] > > On closer examination, it looks like hsx really is obsolete. There are libraries with hsx in their name, but they no longer care about hsx itself.
