On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:47:08 +0200 Kristoffer Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
> stmlib and hstmlib: these I am working on but they have no reverse > deps so you can remove them if you wish. --Kris If you are working on it, it's fine. I just don't like to fix packages, that no one actually cares about. Regards Sven > On Aug 21, 2015 12:06 AM, "Sven Bartscher" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:57:13 +0200 > > Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > haskell-edison-core_1.2.2.1-3 > > > > ^- needs adjustment due to AMP. Does anyone care? Else we can > > > > remove Edison* > > > > > > Still open > > > > > [...] > > > > haskell-x509-util_1.5.2-1 > > > > ^- https://github.com/vincenthz/hs-certificate/issues/54 > > > > > > Nix has removed that packages. Should we as well? > > > > > > > frown_0.6.1-14.1 > > > > ^- AMP fallout. simple patch required > > > > > > Still open. Any takers? > > > > > > > haskell-scrobble_0.2.1.1-3 > > > > ^- https://github.com/chrisdone/scrobble/issues/2 > > > > Drop this? > > > > > > Upstram might look into. But still, this is a non-key non-stackage > > > package. Drop it? > > > > I don't care about these and they don't have reverse dependencies. > > If no one speaks up for them I suggest that we remove them. Should > > we set some kind of deadline for that? > > > > [...] > > > > haskell-hsmtlib_0.2.0.6-1 > > > > ^- Kris is on it > > > > > > Still open. Any takers? > > [...] > > I can't find this in the package-plan. Am I too stupid or is there > > some catch? > > > > Regards > > Sven > > > >
