On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 19:38:27 +0200 Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Am Sonntag, den 23.08.2015, 16:38 +0200 schrieb Sven Bartscher: > > Does anyone know, why we have so many packages in the repository, > > marked as UNRELEASED? > > I think most of them are those, that got rejected for the rpath > > issues and the Uploader field removals. > > Are they marked as UNRELEASED on purpose? Is there something to be > > done with them? > > > > > are you referring to master or experimental? experimental > Most of them on experimental are those where I accidentally dropped > the Uploaders field, and added it back after the recent upload. I did > not think this change warranted an upload, so I did not mark it for > upload. Some packages (including cabal-helper-wrapped) were rejected, because the Uploaders field is required. I also noticed that ghc-mod was rejected, because of the rpaths. I think we should come up with a way, to figure out, which packages were rejected and not fixed yet. I caught a cold at DebConf and I'm currently feeling really miserable and don't know how much I can contribute to that (I will however try to do my best). Regards Sven Regards Sven
