Dear Andreas, with 700+ packages, the maintainer address is unfortunately quite spammed by automatic mails; [email protected] is more reliably read.
Am Samstag, den 12.03.2016, 07:23 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > I would like to backport phybin (which was packaged thanks to your kind > help) to Jessie. The Build-Depends libghc-hierarchical-clustering-dev > and libghc-prettyclass-dev are missing in Jessie (backports). I wonder > if you have any interest in doing these backports. I'd volunteer in > principle to do this in case you confirm that such a backport would be > quite straightforward and there are no known pitfalls to do so. > we don’t have a clear policy for backports yet, and little automation. I’d be wary of pulling in deep dependency trees into backports at this moment, but the two packages you name do not do that. So I don’t see a reason not to do that, even more so since you suggest to do the backporting. No source changes should be necessary, so yes: Just go ahead! Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner Debian Developer [email protected] • https://people.debian.org/~nomeata XMPP: [email protected] • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
